Reading these chapters I came to think that talk in interaction is almost like a chess game, with rules, turn-taking, preferred and dispreferred moves/responses…
It also looks like the participants of a conversation are “knitting” together a net that wraps language and reality.
ten Have proposes these analytical organized (and organizing) activities:
- turn-taking
- organization
- sequence organization (“one thing can lead to another”; adjacency pairs; cycles)
- repair organization
- organization of turn-design
In a certain sense, it sounds like the opposite of “waiting for your turn to speak”: it’s more like inviting the other person to speak, in a way we may feel comfortable with.
This is clear if we consider that conversation is not only constructed, but also designed. I think this is one of the most interesting perspectives of Conversation Analysis, and possibly one of its most important discoveries.
I am starting to think that the context built through discourse overrides the “extrinsic context”, leaving it blurred and faded in the background. Maybe, the more a discourse creates a context aligned to the extrinsic context, the more it is effective (if we think of the fluency of an envisioned sequence of utterances).
I like the metaphor of chess and knitting. And yes the design element is important - and fascinating that most of us learn to do this successfully without being conscious of it..
ReplyDelete